The book of Daniel reinforces the idea that education is discipleship based on the education tactics used with the Jewish exiles.
As I spent the month of July sitting in the book of Daniel, I was struck by the fact that King Nebuchadnezzar understood the importance of education. He understood that education is discipleship. And many of his education tactics are being used in our society today. If you want to get some context on this topic before you continue this post, read my previous post Education Is Discipleship.
At the very beginning of the book, Daniel relates to us how he came to live in Babylon. Most scholars agree that he and his friends, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah (better known by their Babylonian names, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego), were around the age of fifteen when they were essentially kidnapped and taken to Babylon. Once there, these young men were subjected to very intentional and systematic tactics that were intended to make them forget where they came from so they could lead their own people to follow the Babylonian culture.
Babylonian Education Tactics
The first education tactic used by the Babylonians was isolation. Not only were these boys taken from their families in Israel, but they were also separated from the other exiles. They were specifically selected for their appearance, pedigree, and knowledge to be set apart to be trained and taught. This brings us to the second tactic of the Babylonians: indoctrination.
Scripture tells us that they were to be taught the literature and language of the Chaldeans. The goal was to immerse them in this new culture and teach them where the beliefs originated. They were supposed to replace what they had learned in Israel with this new and “superior” knowledge. Since the Babylonians were able to defeat and conquer the Israelites, the Babylonian gods and culture must be better, so the Jews were expected to assimilate, which is the third education tactic.
Daniel and his friends had a complete lifestyle change. They were served foreign (to them) food and drink that came from the king’s table. They were taught what it meant to stand before the king. And they were expected to comply with every request, including answering to a different name. This leads us into the last of the Babylonian education tactics.
The final tactic of the Babylonians was confusion. Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah are all names that point to the God of Israel. Daniel means “God is my judge.” Hananiah means “Yahweh is gracious,” Mishael, “Who is what God is?” and Azariah, “Yahweh is a helper.” The new Babylonian names given to these young men, Belteshazzar, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, all point to the Babylonian gods Maduk, Bel, and Nebo. By creating confusion, King Nebuchadnezzar understood that these boys would cling to anything that appeared to be solid ground. They would go with the flow of the culture because it would all make sense once they had spent the full three years under this indoctrination.
Of course, if you are familiar with the biblical account, you know that they did not assimilate. They rejected the food and held to their Jewish beliefs, and they paid dearly for their faithfulness. We might look at Daniel and his friends and think, “See, they made it. They were able to stay faithful to God in spite of living in a godless society—a society that was hostile to their faith.” But how many captives didn’t remain faithful to God? Of all of the Israelites taken to Babylon, we only know of these four young men who stood strong in spite of the danger.
And boy, did they face danger! They weren’t threatened with death, they were literally thrown into the fire and into the lion’s den where they were expected to die. Only through God’s intervention did they survive. How many others caved under pressure because their faith wasn’t strong enough to sustain them?
So how does this relate to education tactics seen in our society? I have heard and read many preachers talk about this for our college students. Once our kids go off to college, they are isolated, indoctrinated, assimilated, and confused. But I would argue this is happening long before college. I would argue this is the intention of government schools.
Before you close this post offended because your daughter teaches in public school, and she is not indoctrinating her students, please hear me: This is the goal of the school system, not each individual teacher! I am 100% pro teacher. I know many amazing teachers who are doing their best to stand in the gap and protect their students from the world’s harmful ideologies. Unfortunately, most of those same teachers are also wondering how long they will be able to do that.
Now that we have that out of the way, let’s break down this sequence.
Education Tactics in Our Society
Isolation: You may be thinking, “My kids come home everyday, and we talk about what they are learning.” Ok, I get it, but if you have been at work for 8 hours that day, and your child has been at school for 8 hours that day, how much energy do you really have to talk about what they learned, especially if you are spending your evenings at ball practice or gymnastic classes? Are you spending as much time at home teaching them as their teacher is spending with them at school? Not to mention that there seems to be a concerted effort to keep parents in the dark about what takes place in the classroom.
Indoctrination: Knowing how a subject is being taught is more important than the subject itself because it is teaching the students how to approach not only that subject, but every piece of information they encounter. The teacher’s pedagogy is passing on the teacher’s worldview even if it isn’t explicitly stated. Often we discuss what the child learned when we should be discussing how it was taught to get a full picture of the teacher’s worldview.
Assimilation: One thing I can say with absolute certainty after our country’s experience with Covid is that the years of anti-bully slogans and seminars have failed miserably. There was so much peer and administrative pressure to force students to comply with “guidelines” that they now know to go against the grain is to ask for trouble. This applies to the pronoun choices of their classmates, sharing a bathroom or locker room with a child of a different biological gender, and even their status in the classroom based on the color of their skin. We have been taught to “go along to get along” or else…
Confusion: Our children are being taught that gender is fluid, it’s okay to keep secrets from your parents, and all sexual activity at any age is normal. They are being taught that the color of their skin determines their success in life. History is changing, not the future, but the past. Science should not be challenged. And the list could go on.
So, as believers, how do we respond? How do we make sure that we are giving our children the tools they need to stand strong in this hostile world? We disrupt the program!
Disrupt the Education Program
Of course, the best and quickest way to disrupt the program is to pull your kids completely out of the program. Whether you choose to homeschool your kids or send them to a private school where you have a say in what and how they learn, taking them out of the system is the easiest way to disrupt the program. But it isn’t the only way.
Which of these education tactics can you disrupt? Can you be at your child’s school periodically so you are disrupting the isolation? Can you make sure to be teaching your child biblical truth at home (not just in Sunday school) to disrupt the indoctrination and the assimilation? Can you have difficult conversations with your kids to clear up the confusion? The truth is the program is systematic, so disrupting one tactic will disrupt all of them. Imagine what it will do for your child’s confidence and strength to see you in the hallways or the classroom on a regular basis! Be the parent who asks for the lesson plans and gets ahold of the textbook or articles ahead of time. Be the mom who makes regular appointments with your child’s teacher so you can be sure he or she knows your worldview.
Disrupting the system at any level will not guarantee your child will have a strong relationship with God, but he or she will have a greater chance when you set the example. Show your kids what it looks like to live your life with a biblical worldview in spite of the hostility the world throws at you.
While society has historically gone along with the Christian position on the role of women in the church, there is an increase in rebellion.
Last week I discussed how we need to handle the information we glean from Scripture on the topic of the role of women in ministry. If you have not read that post yet, please do so first, as it sets the stage for some of the things I will be touching on in this post.
The second thing I want to address before we dive into the topic of the role of women in ministry is why this has become such an issue. For a long time, it seems that culture has gone along with the historical Christian positions, but now that our society seems to be rebelling against biblical truth, we are seeing more an more debate about this topic, we are seeing more women carrying the title of pastor, and even within the church, we are seeing feminism take root.
Personally, I believe there are two main reasons for the rebellion against historical position of the church. The first one is that we have done it wrong. I will be spending the bulk of this series breaking down this point, but I believe churches have taken it too far. They have set up guardrails in order not to cross God’s line, but in so doing, they have removed women from roles the Bible doesn’t forbid. So the current rebellion is a reaction to mismanagement of this issue in many churches. There is more to come on this topic, but let me quickly mention the second reason I believe we are facing this issue.
The second reason this topic is so controversial is because men are not stepping up. As women, we see a job that needs done, and we are quick to take care of it. Even when it is a role we are not meant to fill, we think it’s better for us to do it than for it to go undone. This thinking is actually a result of the fall. This is one of the consequences faced by Eve for the part she played in bringing sin into the world.
In Genesis 3:16b God tells Eve that,
“Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you” (NIV).
I don’t usually use the NIV, but I want to demonstrate how the translation can cause us to misinterpret this verse. As we read through the book of Genesis and we come upon this verse, it seems almost sweet. We think Eve will desire her husband. Isn’t that what a wife is supposed to do? The crux of the problem lies with that little preposition “for” (sorry for the grammar lesson, but I promise I’m going somewhere).
In this case, looking up the definition of that little word ‘ēl doesn’t help much. When we look in Strong’s Concordance for some direction on this word, we get this:
It is clear that it is a preposition, but it is not clear which English preposition should translate it. So the next step is to find another place in Scripture where it is used in the same word combination. Fortunately, we don’t have to go far.
In Genesis 4:7, God is speaking to Cain about his sacrifice when He says,
“If you do what is right, will you not be accepted? But if you do not do what is right, sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must rule over it” (NIV) (emphasis mine).
The phrase “it desires to have you” includes that same little preposition ‘ēl in the original language.
If sin desires you the same way a wife desires her husband, it is easy to see what is meant in this passage. Your desire is to come against your husband, to subdue him, to cause him to submit to you just like sin desires that for all of humanity. If we take the time to read the passage in other translations, the meaning might become a little more clear:
ESV: “Your desire shall be contrary to your husband, but he shall rule over you.”
NET: “You will want to control your husband, but he will dominate you.”
God established the husband in authority over the wife, and sin disrupted God’s design as it always does. Because of our sin nature, we women do not like to submit to authority. While this is also true of men, they do not have the same biblical responsibility of submission that women have. We could talk about this in more depth, but ultimately, this series is about the role of women in ministry, not the role of men.
While this passage is specifically discussing the role of women in marriage and the difficulties that arise because of sin, the family is where all of the enemy’s tactics begin. If he can destroy the family, that destruction naturally carries out into society. Our sin natures don’t stop at the thresholds of our homes. When we begin to rebel against our husbands’ authority, we will inevitably carry that out to any place where men have been given headship by God. What we practice in our homes carries over to all areas of our lives.
Please do not take this to mean that I am saying women should submit to men. That is not what the Bible teaches. Each woman is to submit to her own husband (Ephesians 5:22). This will become part of the bigger discussion of this topic. But it is important to realize that our issues with submitting are not God-given; they are a result of sin. This is why our hackles come up when we read things in Scripture that tell us it isn’t our place to fill the position that has gone unfilled by the men around us.
Ultimately, our reaction to jump in when it isn’t our job is a lack of trust in God to fulfill His purposes. We cannot please God by our actions when those actions are in direct opposition to what He tells us in Scripture. Men and women are different, not in value but in design and responsibility. Our goal should always be to do the things He has placed in front of us. He will not bless the work of our hands when our hands are doing work meant for others.
Often we are so concerned about doing the job and filling the gap that we forget our greatest tool of all: prayer. If there is a job that needs done, but it is not your place to do it, don’t take over. Instead, hand it over to God. While it can be especially difficult to sit back and wait for God to work, prayer allows you to be part of that process, and when the job gets done in His timing, the blessings are so much sweeter than when we try to do it in our own strength outside of His will.
There is so much controversy about what Scripture says women are allowed to do in ministry. But what does the Bible actually say?
For a while, I have been working through what the Bible teaches about the role of women in ministry. While I’ve struggled with the best way to communicate what I’m learning, I think it is best to just jump in.
Perhaps the best place to start is to answer how we should handle the information we find. The truth is there are countless scholars who have traveled this road before me, but there are almost as many interpretations. Because it isn’t clear cut, I wanted to simply study what Scripture says about it instead of going straight to a preacher I trust.
I started my study with a look at 2 Timothy 3:16-17,
“All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.”
Why is this the place to begin a study on the role of women in ministry? Because undoubtedly, I am going to come across passages of Scripture that rub me the wrong way. But if I truly believe all Scripture is inspired and is profitable, I must set my feelings aside and objectively look at what the Bible says on the topic.
I’ve been spending this month reading and rereading the book of James, and there are a few passages that have also convicted me of this truth. James 1:19 says,
“Know this, my beloved brothers: let every person be quick to hear, slow to speak, slow to anger.”
While this passage can be used to address our human relationships, when taken in context, James is talking about being slow to anger when we hear God’s Word. James understood that, because of our sin natures, we would struggle with some of the things God tells us, and he encourages us to be quick to hear and slow to anger.
But James doesn’t stop there. He also tells us in verse 22 of the same chapter,
“But be doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving yourselves.”
It isn’t good enough to read the Word and learn the truth God has for us; we are also called to act upon that truth. So if the Bible teaches me something that rubs me the wrong way, it is still my responsibility to follow through on that lesson according to the Word of God. And we must not forget what James says in chapter 4, verse 17,
“So whoever knows the right thing to do and fails to do it, for him it is sin.”
So as I begin to unpack this controversial topic, I need to continually remind myself that Scripture is inspired and profitable, I need to be slow to anger when I don’t like what I find, I should put into practice the things I learn, and it is a sin to know the right thing to do and refuse to do it. Wow! I haven’t even gotten to the main topic, and I am already so convicted!
This approach is not limited to this topic. If we truly believe Scripture is sufficient to teach us how to live, then there will be many lessons we come across in the Bible that may step on our toes a bit. But the Bible isn’t just any book where we can “chew the meat and spit out the bones.” It is our authority and must be approached as such. Truthfully, if we are not going to hold this view of Scripture, there’s no reason to study it. If it is not authoritative and complete, what difference does it make what it teaches?
No matter what topic you are studying, be slow to anger when you don’t like what you’re reading, and hold yourself accountable to act on your new knowledge even if you don’t like it.
While it may be beneficial to take personality tests in the business world, what role should they play for the Christian?
The other day, the topic of conversation in my home was personality tests. If you’ve been here for a bit, you’ve probably heard me talk about the enneagram and my experience with it. If this is a new topic to you, you can read all about my journey with the enneagram here. Spoiler alert: Christians should steer clear.
I have always struggled with personality tests and spiritual gifts tests. It has taken me a long time to figure out why they rub me the wrong way. I don’t believe it is a sin to take these tests, but I don’t believe they are particularly productive, especially for a Christian. But before we talk about that, let’s think through the reasons these types of tests are taken.
Personality tests seem to be more common in business circles. Whether it is the Disc Profile, the Meyers-Briggs Indicator, or the enneagram, the goal is to figure out what your strengths and weaknesses are. This makes sense from a business standpoint because if you want your business to succeed, you want to take on those tasks that fall to your strengths and delegate the ones in which you don’t excel. The purpose is success.
Spiritual gifts tests are usually taken in churches or other ministries. We aren’t really given a comprehensive list of spiritual gifts in Scripture, and if you’re a cessationist (you believe some spiritual gifts have ceased to exist), some of those that are given have to be either ignored or redefined. But the goal is to put you in positions of service that best suit your gifts. If you are gifted in hospitality but score very low on administration, you might be better suited to be a greeter at the door than to track the finances of the church. If you want your church to run smoothly, you play to people’s strengths.
Maybe the reason I have struggled with this idea is because, as a missionary kid, I was a “hole plugger”: if there was a hole in any part of our ministry, someone in our family usually plugged it, even if that wasn’t one of our gifts. My dad learned to play the accordion so he could provide accompaniment for the song service when my grandmother was ill and couldn’t play the piano. When there was no one to clean the church, my sisters and I became the church janitors. If the nursery workers didn’t show up one Sunday, it became my job to fill in. And far from being a detriment to my growth, these experiences were the ones that taught me the most. So while I understand the reason churches administer these tests, I don’t see it as essential or even necessary.
The tests box you in
It doesn’t matter which personality test I take, I never like the results. And with most of the tests, there is no option of movement—once a melancholy, always a melancholy. The saying, “the grass is always greener on the other side” has certainly been true for me with each of these tests I’ve taken.
The tests encourage deceit
Maybe it is just my personality (pun intended), but anytime I’ve taken a personality or spiritual gifts test, I know what the “right” answer is to get my desired outcome. The tests lend themselves to deceit because you don’t want to answer truthfully. Instead, you want to give the answer that paints you in the best light for that question. Your answer is also highly influenced by your mood or health that day, which skews the results.
The tests give you an out
As I said before, growing up, my sisters and I were hole pluggers, and it has always been frustrating to me when the same few people in a church are doing all of the jobs. The most common excuse I hear when others won’t volunteer is that it isn’t their gifting, or they aren’t good at that job, or it isn’t their strong suit. Yet Scripture tells us that God is strong in our weakness. We shouldn’t only be doing those jobs that fall in our strengths because then we are doing them in our strength. When we take on jobs or ministries that land squarely in our weaknesses, God is glorified through our work.
The tests don’t solve the problem
We are under the delusion that understanding our personalities or our spiritual gifts will give us confidence to do what God has tasked us to do. It will embolden us because we are “playing to our strengths.” Or we will “be the best version of ourselves.” When the truth is self-knowledge will never lead to Christlikeness. And isn’t that the goal? To become more like Christ, not be the best version of myself? No amount of navel gazing will help me be more like Christ. In fact, introspection is a tool of the enemy because as long as I have my eyes on myself, I don’t have my eyes on Christ.
Confidence comes from knowing God. As we spend time in the Word, getting to know Him—His character, His plans, His desires for us—we start to see how we can be a light in this dark world. As we begin to understand His heart, we grow bolder in our witness and in our prayer life. As we get a glimpse of who we are in light of who He is, we understand how to best serve Him in spite of the results of any man-made test.
When it comes down to it, relying on personality and spiritual gifts tests shows that we do not actually believe in the sufficiency of Scripture. We believe that we need something outside of Scripture, outside of God’s Word, to tell us how to behave, what to do, and who to be.
Let me encourage you to invest your time in reading, studying, and understanding God’s Word rather than taking personality tests. God allows for growth and change; He wants to transform you from the inside out. He values truth and courage; He wants you to step out in faith and take on the tasks He places before you in spite of your weakness. He doesn’t give you an out; your spirit will be restless until you obey. And He does solve your problems because He knows you better than you could ever know yourself, and He knows what will give you peace in this tumultuous world.
Debating which is best for our children’s education—public, private, or homeschool—is missing the mark. Education is discipleship!
I’ve had this idea taking shape in the back of my mind over the last several months as I have spent time in God’s Word, read books about the state of our society, and talked to parents about educational philosophies. When we debate the education of our children and whether we should send them to public school, pay for private school, or keep them home and homeschool, I think we are missing the mark.
Our society has led us to believe that the purpose of education is to get a job. We need to educate ourselves so an employer will hire us and we can support our families financially. And this isn’t limited to college because without a top notch K-12 education, we won’t get into college where we get the education to get the job! But is that truly the purpose of education? The answer is a clear, resounding “No.” I have come to realize that education is so much more than job preparation. Education is discipleship.
The seed of this idea was planted when I was reading Deuteronomy 6:4-9. This is a familiar passage because it begins with the Jewish Shema: “Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one” (v. 4, ESV). But it goes on to tell the Israelites that the things they have heard (the Ten Commandments) need to be taught to their children diligently when the family sits together, walks together, goes to bed, and wakes up. They are to teach these things, “talk of them,” “bind them,” and “write them.” Verse 5 seems to sum up the purpose: “You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might.” This doesn’t sound like it has anything to do with getting a job.
I spent the month of July reading and re-reading the book of Daniel. King Nebuchadnezzar seemed to understand the concept of discipleship through education. Daniel begins his book by describing the process the Babylonians followed to assimilate the conquered people into their culture. They chose smart, good-looking boys and taught them their literature and language. They fed them foreign food until they acquired a taste for it. They gave them new names. And they did all of this for three years. Once the boys were trained, they were put in positions of authority over their own people but under the control of Babylon. Nebuchadnezzar understood that loyalty came through assimilation.
I’ve read a lot of books that try to explain the state of our current society. Many of these books demonstrate how Marxism has taken over and godless ideas have replaced the Bible-based concepts spelled out by our founding fathers. But I have struggled to understand how exactly this happened, that is until I read The Battle for the American Mind by Pete Hegseth and David Goodwin.
In the book, Hegseth introduces the idea of paideia, a Greek word from which we get our word pedagogy. The word doesn’t have a clear translation into English, and Hegseth goes to great trouble to define it, illustrate it, and demonstrate it. But when it was all said and done, the word that came to my mind that best fits Paideia is “Worldview.” Pedagogy is “the act of formulating a culture in children” (Hegseth 30). As G.K. Chesterton said, “Education is not a subject and does not deal in subjects. It is instead a transfer of a way of life.”
So when we take another look at how our society views education versus the true purpose of education, it is clear how far off we’ve been. If education is discipleship, who should be the discipler? How should we make educational decisions? What should be our motivation? And ultimately, no matter how we choose to educate/disciple our children, the buck stops with parents according to the passage in Deuteronomy.
It isn’t really a question of public school, homeschool, private school, etc. It is a question of how we are going to instill a biblical worldview into our children so they will “love the Lord [their] God with all [their] heart and with all [their] soul and with all [their] might.”
